CourtListener 10182458•Deputy v. Fox Rothschild LLP
Texto completo
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JAY DEPUTY, §
§ No. 275, 2024
Plaintiff Below, §
Appellant, § Court Below–Court of Chancery
§ of the State of Delaware
v. §
§ C.A. No. 2022-0469
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP, ITS §
NAMED ASSOCIATES AND §
PARTNER(S) ET AL., §
§
Defendants Below, §
Appellees. §
Submitted: October 18, 2024
Decided: October 31, 2024
ORDER
On September 30, 2024, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, sent by
certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be
dismissed for his failure to pay the Supreme Court filing fee or file a motion to
proceed in forma pauperis. The appellant received the notice, as evidenced by the
certified return receipt filed with the Court on October 7, 2024. A timely response
to the notice to show cause was due on or before October 17, 2024. To date, the
appellant has not paid the Supreme Court filing fee, filed a motion to proceed in
forma pauperis, or responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of this action
is therefore deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is
DISMISSED under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow
Justice
2
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.