CourtListener 10283014•Anderson v. State
Texto completo
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
LESTER F. ANDERSON, §
§
Defendant Below, § No. 258, 2024
Appellant, §
§ Court Below—Superior Court
v. § of the State of Delaware
§
STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 30109009DI (N)
§
Appellee. §
Submitted: October 10, 2024
Decided: November 22, 2024
Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s motion to
affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the Superior
Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its May 31,
2024 order denying the appellant’s sixth motion for postconviction relief.1 The
Court declines to address the appellant’s Ex Post Facto Clause argument because he
did not raise it in the Superior Court.2
1
State v. Anderson, 2024 WL 2815460 (Del. Super. Ct. May 31, 2024).
2
Supr. Ct. R. 8.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow
Justice
2
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.