Anderson v. State

CourtListener 10283014Del22 de nov. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LESTER F. ANDERSON, §
§
Defendant Below, § No. 258, 2024
Appellant, §
§ Court Below—Superior Court
v. § of the State of Delaware
§
STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 30109009DI (N)
§
Appellee. §

Submitted: October 10, 2024
Decided: November 22, 2024

Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s motion to

affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the Superior

Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its May 31,

2024 order denying the appellant’s sixth motion for postconviction relief.1 The

Court declines to address the appellant’s Ex Post Facto Clause argument because he

did not raise it in the Superior Court.2

1
State v. Anderson, 2024 WL 2815460 (Del. Super. Ct. May 31, 2024).
2
Supr. Ct. R. 8.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow
Justice

2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.