Martin v. Nixon

CourtListener 9768045Del21 de jun. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JAMES L. MARTIN, §
§
Plaintiff Below, § No. 440, 2023
Appellant, §
§ Court Below–Superior Court
v. § of the State of Delaware
§
DAVID H. NIXON, § C.A. No. N17C-08-152
§
Defendant Below, §
Appellee. §

Submitted: April 19, 2024
Decided: June 21, 2024

Before VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, and LEGROW, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we find it

evident that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the

reasons cited by the Superior Court in its October 31, 2023 order denying the

appellant’s supplemental amended renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law,

the appellant’s amended motion to alter or amend the judgment, and the appellant’s

motion to reopen the judgment.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court be AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor
Justice

2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.