2026001896•EEOC Appeal 2026001896
Texto completo
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Sector P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Clint G.,1 Complainant, v. Brooke Rollins, Secretary, Department of Agriculture (Natural Resources Conservation Service), Agency. Appeal No. 2026001896 Agency No. FPAC-2026-00110 DECISION Complainant filed a timely appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) from the Agency's decision dated March 20, 2026, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that Complainant's complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact. During the period at issue, Complainant worked as a soil conservationist at the Agency’s National Resources Conservation Service in Frankfort, Kentucky. 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website.
2026001896 2 On February 6, 2026, Complainant initiated EEO Counselor contact. Informal efforts at resolution were not successful. On March 27, 2026, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of national origin (Not Specified) and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity when: on June 27, 2025, Complainant’s second-line supervisor continued to assign him to work out of the Bardstown field office. On March 20, 2026, the Agency issued a final decision dismissing Complainant’s formal complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact. The Agency stated that Complainant failed to comply with applicable time limits under 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1), of 45-days from the date of the discriminatory matter alleged to make EEO Counselor contact. The instant appeal followed. On appeal, Complainant submits numerous statements and documents. In relevant part, the Agency submits its opposition to Complainant’s appeal. The Agency’s decision to dismiss a complaint is subject to de novo review by the Commission, which requires the Commission to examine the record without regard to the factual and legal determinations of the previous decision maker and issue its decision based on the Commission’s own assessment of the record and its interpretation of the law. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a). The Commission should construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the complainant and take the complaint’s allegations as true. See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077 (March 13, 1997). Thus, all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the complaint’s allegations must be made in favor of the complainant. The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event occurred on February 12, 2025. In his formal complaint, Complainant stated that, since February 12, 2025, his assignment at Bardstown Field Office was repeatedly extended. Complainant stated that his Bardstown Field Office assignment began in January 2024 and was extended repeatedly for over two and one half years. Complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until February 6, 2026, which was 346 days after the
2026001896 3 discriminatory event. Even a generous reading of Complainant’s formal complaint demonstrated that he was aware of the alleged discrimination by February 12, 2025. Complainant had until April 11, 2025 to make timely EEO Counselor contact. On appeal, Complainant has presented no persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact. The Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED. STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL RECONSIDERATION (M1125) The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider this appellate decision if Complainant or the Agency submits a written request that contains arguments or evidence that tend to establish that: 1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or 2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. Requests for reconsideration must be filed with EEOC’s Office of Federal Sector (OFS) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision. If the party requesting reconsideration elects to file a statement or brief in support of the request, that statement or brief must be filed together with the request for reconsideration. A party shall have twenty (20) calendar days from receipt of another party’s request for reconsideration within which to submit a brief or statement in opposition. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 § VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). Complainant should submit their request for reconsideration, and any statement or brief in support of their request, via the EEOC Public Portal, which can be found at https://publicportal.eeoc.gov/Portal/Login.aspx. Alternatively, Complainant can submit their request and arguments to the Director, Office of Federal Sector, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, via regular mail addressed to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail addressed to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a legible postmark, a complainant’s
2026001896 4 request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if OFS receives it by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. An agency’s request for reconsideration must be submitted in digital format via the EEOC’s Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g). Either party’s request and/or statement or brief in opposition must also include proof of service on the other party, unless Complainant files their request via the EEOC Public Portal, in which case no proof of service is required. Failure to file within the 30-day time period will result in dismissal of the party’s request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted together with the request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(f). COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0124) You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by their full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests.
2026001896 5 Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: T. Gimbrere ____________ Gul Chaudhry’s se T. Gimbrere, Acting Director Office of Federal Sector September 28, 2026 Date
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.