4:21-cr-01384•USA v. Ramirez-Roman
Texto completo
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Hector Francisco Ramirez-Roman, Defendant. No. CR-21-01384-001-TUC-JCH (EJM) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s “Pro Se Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Based on the 2025 Sentencing Commission Amendment for Drug Offenders with Minimal Participation” (“Motion for Sentence Reduction”) (Doc. 70). Defendant argues he is eligible for a sentence reduction under Amendment 833 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which instructs courts on the application of a mitigating role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 in drug trafficking cases. Under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, courts are instructed to decrease a defendant’s offense level if he was a minimal or minor participant in any criminal activity. Typically, “this guideline is not applicable unless more than one defendant was involved in the offense.” § 3B1.2 cmt. Amendment 833, however, added special eligibility for defendants in drug trafficking cases: “In addition to the circumstances identified in § 3B1.2, an adjustment under § 31B.2 is generally warranted if the defendant’s primary function in the offense was performing a low-level trafficking function,” including serving as a courier. § 2D1.1(e)(2)(B). Under this provision, most of the requirements of § 3B1.2 apply, “except Case 4:21-cr-01384-JCH-EJM Document 71 Filed 12/23/25 Page 1 of 3
- 2 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 that[, relevant here,] the adjustment shall apply regardless of whether the offense involved other participants in addition to the defendant.” Id. At first glance, it appears § 2D1.1(e)(2)(B) could apply to Defendant.1 But under the Sentencing Guidelines, [i]n a case in which a defendant is serving a term of imprisonment, and the guidelines range applicable to that defendant has subsequently been lowered as a result of an amendment to the Guidelines Manual listed in subsection (d) below, the court may reduce the defendant’s term of imprisonment as provided by 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). § 1B1.10(a)(1) (emphasis added). The Commentary to § 1B1.10 explicitly states, “Eligibility for consideration under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is triggered only by an amendment listed in subsection (d).” § 1B1.10(a) cmt. (emphasis added). Subsection d does not include Amendment 833 among the amendments that apply retroactively. § 1B1.10(d). In the Ninth Circuit, courts “consider three factors when assessing whether an amendment to the Guidelines applies retroactively”: (1) whether the amendment is listed as a retroactive amendment in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(d); (2) whether the amendment is characterized as a clarification; and (3) whether the amendment resolves a circuit split. United States v. Tolbert, 704 F. App’x 646, 648 (9th Cir. 2017) (quoting United States v. Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d 519, 522 (9th Cir. 2016)). Amendment 833 is not listed under § 1B1.10(d), it inserted a substantive addition to (rather than clarification of) § 2D1.1, and it did not purport to resolve a circuit split. Under these factors, Amendment 833 is not retroactive, and Defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction on this basis. /// /// /// /// /// 1 Whether a defendant is eligible for a decrease in offense level under § 2D1.1(e)(2)(B) is “based on the totality of the circumstances and involves a determination that is heavily dependent upon the facts of the particular case.” Here, because Amendment 833 does not apply retroactively, the Court need not make a substantive judgment on the extent to which it would have adjusted Defendant’s sentence, if at all. Case 4:21-cr-01384-JCH-EJM Document 71 Filed 12/23/25 Page 2 of 3
- 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant’s Motion for Sentence Reduction (Doc. 70). Dated this 23rd day of December, 2025. Case 4:21-cr-01384-JCH-EJM Document 71 Filed 12/23/25 Page 3 of 3
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.