USA v. Arteaga et al

3:23-cr-00473Cand31 de mar. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
SIERRA PROMISE DUGAN
Sierra Dugan Law
420 3rd Street, Suite 250
Oakland, California 94607
Tel. 510.214.2194
sierra@sierraduganlaw.com
Counsel for Defendant
JOSE MEDINA MURILLO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOSE MEDINA MURILLO,
Defendant.
No. 3:23-CR-00473 CRB
STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME
UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT FROM
JANUARY 6, 2025 THROUGH APRIL 1,
2026; [PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties were scheduled to appear for status on March 25, 2026 that has been continued
to April 1, 2026 at the defense’s request for effective preparation of counsel after having the
defendant assessed for competency by a doctor. The parties stipulate and respectfully request that
the time from March 25, 2026 through April 1, 2026 be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. Failure
to grant the continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time to necessary for effective
preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: March 26, 2026 	s/ Sierra Dugan
SIERRA DUGAN
Counsel for Defendant
JOSE MEDINA MURILLO
Dated: March 26, 2026 	s/ SD per email authorization
KEVIN YEH
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Case 3:23-cr-00473-CRB Document 98 Filed 03/31/26 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
USA v. Medina Murillo, Stipulation and
[Proposed] Order, Case No. 3:23-cr-00473-CRB
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
For the reasons stated in the parties’ stipulations, the Court finds that the exclusion of time
for effective preparation from March 25, 2026 through April 1, 2026, is warranted and that the ends
of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a
speedy trial. 	18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). 	The failure to grant the requested continuance by the
defense would deny the defendant the time necessary for effective preparation of counsel taking
into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:
HON. CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
March 31, 2026
Case 3:23-cr-00473-CRB Document 98 Filed 03/31/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.