NETGEAR, Inc. v. Choice Electronics Inc.

3:25-cv-02601Cand24 de nov. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NETGEAR, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHOICE ELECTRONICS INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 25-cv-02601-RS
ORDER EXTENDING CASE
MANAGEMENT DEADLINES AND
TRIAL DATE
Plaintiff seeks to extend the deadline for completion of fact discovery in this matter,
arguing defendant has delayed and obstructed the discovery process. Defendant contends plaintiff
has not shown good cause for an extension, and that plaintiff is responsible for any delay.
Defendant further contends that if the close of fact discovery is postponed, other deadlines should
likewise be extended. Without opining as to whether either or both parties may have engaged in
unreasonable delay, good cause appears to adopt defendant’s proposed schedule extending all
remaining dates in this action, as set out in Dkt. No. 41, with the understanding that the new
pretrial conference date and the trial date may be subject to further adjustment by the court.
Case 3:25-cv-02601-RS Document 42 Filed 11/24/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>
CASE NO. 25-cv-02601-RS
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of
 California
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 24, 2025
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
Chief United States District Judge
Case 3:25-cv-02601-RS Document 42 Filed 11/24/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.