Abrams v. PG&E Corporation et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ABRAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
PG&E CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Case No. 25-cv-09155-HSG
ORDER GRANTING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF
Re: Dkt. No. 7
On December 12, 2025, a group of pro se individuals filed an amicus curiae brief in this
case, asserting that they all have valid claims as part of the PG&E Fire Victims Trust. See Dkt.
No. 6. This was improper. The individuals should have sought leave of Court before they filed
their brief. Nevertheless, the Court will accept the amicus brief as filed, but cautions amici that,
despite being pro se, the Court expects them to scrupulously comply with all court procedures and
orders in future.
The Court further GRANTS the administrative motion for an extension of time to respond
to the amicus brief, filed by PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (together,
“Appellees”). Dkt. No. 7. Appellees shall respond to the amicus brief by January 19, 2026. The
Court DENIES Appellant William B. Abrams and the amici’s request for a hearing at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
12/29/2025
Case 4:25-cv-09155-HSG Document 11 Filed 12/29/25 Page 1 of 1