5:26-mj-70438•USA v. Nguyen
Texto completo
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER NGUYEN, 26-CR-70438 MAG 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JODI LINKER Federal Public Defender Northern District of California DEJAN M. GANTAR Assistant Federal Public Defender 8th Floor - Suite 820 55 South Market Street San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 291-7753 Facsimile: (408) 291-7399 Email: Dejan_Gantar@fd.org Counsel for Defendant NGUYEN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HOANG NGUYEN, Defendant. Case No.: 26-CR-70438 MAG (NC) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER STIPULATION Defendant Hoang Nguyen, represented by AFPD Dejan M. Gantar, and the Government, represented by AUSA Kenneth Chambers, respectfully request that the status conference currently scheduled for October 13, 2026 be continued until December 18, 2026. The parties make this request so that the parties have additional time to continue working toward a potential resolution, and for defense counsel to review discovery and confer with his client. The parties further stipulate and agree that the time between October 1, 2026 and December 18, 2026 be excluded to allow for effective preparation of counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and that the ends of justice served by granting the request outweigh the best interests of the Case 5:26-mj-70438-MAG Document 24 Filed 10/09/26 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER NGUYEN, 26-CR-70438 MAG 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The parties further stipulate and agree that, given the need to investigate matters which may bear on the disposition in the case, good cause exists for extending the time limits for a preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(d), and defense counsel accordingly consents on behalf of the defendant to extending the time limit for the preliminary hearing. The parties further stipulate and agree to an extension of time for the 30-day time period of an indictment under the Speedy Trial Act. IT IS SO STIPULATED. *The filing attorney certifies that he has received written authorization to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order on behalf of the non-filing attorney. Dated: October 9, 2026 JODI LINKER Federal Public Defender Northern District of California /S/ DEJAN M. GANTAR Assistant Federal Public Defender Dated: October 9, 2026 CRAIG MISSAKIAN United States Attorney Northern District of California /S/ KENNETH CHAMBERS Assistant United States Attorney Case 5:26-mj-70438-MAG Document 24 Filed 10/09/26 Page 2 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER NGUYEN, 26-CR-70438 MAG 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and for good cause shown, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the status conference currently scheduled for October 13, 2026 be continued until December 18, 2026. For good cause shown, the Court further finds that failing to exclude the time between October 13, 2026 and December 18, 2026 would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and that the ends of justice served by excluding that time from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the time between October 13, 2026 and December 18, 2026 shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). The Court further finds good cause exists for extending the time limits for a preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 and for extending the 30-day time period for an indictment under the Speedy Trial Act. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1; 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ______________ HON. NATHANAEL COUSINS United States Chief Magistrate Judge October 9, 2026 Case 5:26-mj-70438-MAG Document 24 Filed 10/09/26 Page 3 of 3
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.