COLEMAN v. PEIRSON et al

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
OSCAR COLEMAN, III,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 1:25-cv-268-TKW-MAF
OFFICER PIERSON, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 24). No objections were filed.
Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the entire
case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that the Court
does not have the authority to order Plaintiff’s transfer. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. Plaintiff’s motion requesting a “protective order transfer” (Doc. 23) is
DENIED.
3. This case is returned to the magistrate judge for further pretrial
proceedings.
Case 1:25-cv-00268-TKW-MAF Document 33 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2026.
__________________________________
T. KENT WETHERELL, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:25-cv-00268-TKW-MAF Document 33 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2