CALI v. SETH et al

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
SALEEBAN MAXAMETH CALI,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 1:26-cv-28-AW-MAF
UNITED STATES SECRETARY, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff initiated this case by filing a complaint. Under the court’s local rules,
a plaintiff filing a civil action must simultaneously pay the filing fee or file a motion
for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.3. Plaintiff neither paid
the filing fee nor moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court will
therefore dismiss this case without prejudice. See Castro v. Director, F.D.I.C., 449
F. App’x 786, 788 (11th Cir. 2011).1
The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed without
prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee or move for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis.” The clerk will then close the file.
1 I also note that the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation
recommending dismissal on other grounds. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff did not timely file
any objection. It appears he has abandoned the case.
Case 1:26-cv-00028-AW-MAF Document 5 Filed 03/09/26 Page 1 of 2

2
SO ORDERED on March 9, 2026.
s/ Allen Winsor
Chief United States District Judge
Case 1:26-cv-00028-AW-MAF Document 5 Filed 03/09/26 Page 2 of 2