RUSHING v. BIO LIFE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
SHAUN RUSHING,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 4:25-cv-410-AW-MAF
BIO LIFE,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff filed a pro se lawsuit against Bio Life. The magistrate judge
recommends dismissal. ECF No. 6. There has been no objection to the report and
recommendation.
I agree with the magistrate judge that dismissal is appropriate. There is
nothing in the complaint to show subject-matter jurisdiction, and there is no reason
to believe an amendment might change that. Plaintiff had the burden of
demonstrating jurisdiction, and he made no effort to meet that burden.
The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed without
prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.” The clerk will then close the file.
SO ORDERED on October 31, 2025.
s/ Allen Winsor
Chief United States District Judge
Case 4:25-cv-00410-AW-MAF Document 7 Filed 10/31/25 Page 1 of 1