BELLAMY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION (VR)

4:26-cv-00023Flnd9 de mar. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
KIMBERLY BELLAMY,
Plaintiff,
v. 	Case No.: 4:26cv23-MW/MAF
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION,
Defendant.
_________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, ECF No. 8, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections,
ECF No. 11. This Court agrees with Plaintiff inasmuch as she contends her first
amended complaint contains detailed factual allegations concerning her pursuit of
services from Defendant. However, having reviewed the detailed factual allegations
in the first amended complaint, this Court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to allege
facts that, taken as true and construing all reasonable inferences in her favor, give
rise to plausible claims for disability discrimination under the ADA and retaliation
under the Rehabilitation Act.
Case 4:26-cv-00023-MW-MAF Document 15 Filed 03/09/26 Page 1 of 2
2
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation, ECF No. 8, is accepted and adopted over
the Plaintiff’s objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment
stating, “Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” The pending motion, ECF
No. 12, is DENIED as moot. The Clerk shall close the file.
SO ORDERED on March 9, 2026.
s/Mark E. Walker 	____
United States District Judge
Case 4:26-cv-00023-MW-MAF Document 15 Filed 03/09/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.