Peterson v. United States of America, Social Security Administration et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
CARY PETERSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, VA HONOLULU
REGIONAL OFFICE, VETERANS
AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT,
Defendants.
Civil No. 25-00511 MWJS-RT
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION TO DENY
WITHOUT PREJUDICE DKT. NO. 2,
EX-PARTE EXPEDITED MOTION
FOR LEAVE ON RULE 17(C), IFP
APPLICATION, & ELECTRONIC
FILING OR REMOTE APPEARANCE
FOR HEARING
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION TO DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE DKT. NO. 2, EX-PARTE
EXPEDITED MOTION FOR LEAVE ON RULE 17(C), IFP APPLICATION, &
ELECTRONIC FILING OR REMOTE APPEARANCE FOR HEARING
Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on
December 9, 2025, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.1, the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation, Dkt. No. 8, filed December 9, 2025, are adopted as the opinion and
order of this court.
//
//
Case 1:25-cv-00511-MWJS-RT Document 9 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2
PageID.<pageID>

2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 5, 2026, at Honolulu, Hawai‘i.
Civil No. 25-00511 MWJS-RT, Peterson v. United States of America, Social Security
Administration et al; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION TO DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE DKT. NO. 2, EX-PARTE
EXPEDITED MOTION FOR LEAVE ON RULE 17(C), IFP APPLICATION, &
ELECTRONIC FILING OR REMOTE APPEARANCE FOR HEARING
/s/ Micah	 W.J. Smith
Micah W.J. Smith
United States 	District 	Judge
Case 1:25-cv-00511-MWJS-RT Document 9 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2
PageID.<pageID>