St. Luke's Health System, LTD. v. Labrador

1:25-cv-00015Idd29 de jan. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

O RDER - 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
ST. LUKE’S HEALTH SYSTEM,
LTD.,
Plaintiff,
v.
RAÚL LABRADOR, Attorney
General of the State of Idaho,
Defendant.
Case No. 1:25-cv-00015-BLW
MEMORANDUM DECISION &
ORDER RE EXTENSION OF
DEADLINES
Before the Court is Plaintiff St. Luke’s Health System, Ltd.’s Second
Motion for Extension of Unexpired Scheduling Order Deadlines. Defendant does
not oppose the motion. See Dkt. 81. Good cause appearing, the Court will grant the
unopposed motion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Second Motion for an Extension of Unexpired Scheduling
Order Deadlines (Dkt. 78) is GRANTED.
2. The deadlines set forth in this Court’s Scheduling Order at Dkt. 59 (as
modified by the Order at Dkt. 69) are further modified as follows:
a. 	Plaintiff’s expert disclosure: 	March 24, 2026
b. Defendant’s expert disclosure: 	April 23, 2026
c. 	Plaintiff’s rebuttal expert disclosure: 	May 8, 2026
d. Fact discovery cutoff: 	June 12, 2026
e. 	Expert discovery cutoff: 	July 10, 2026
f. 	Dispositive-motion deadline: 	July 27, 2026
Case 1:25-cv-00015-BLW Document 82 Filed 01/29/26 Page 1 of 2
O RDER - 2
3. All other provisions of the Scheduling Order at Dkt. 59 shall remain in
effect.
DATED: January 29, 2026
_________________________
B. Lynn Winmill
U.S. District Court Judge
Case 1:25-cv-00015-BLW Document 82 Filed 01/29/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.