Buckmire v. Energy Transport Solutions, Inc. et al

Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
KARIAH BUCKMIRE and
ZACHARY LANGLEY,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BILLY JOE DOLLISON and
ENERGY TRANSPORTATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendants.
Case No. 24-CV-02215-SPM
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
McGLYNN, District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court for consideration of a Motion to Compel
filed by Defendants Billy Joe Dollison and Energy Transportation Solutions, Inc.
(Doc. 58). On October 27, 2025, the Court held a Motions Hearing on this matter. For
the reasons described at that hearing, the Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED.
1. 	The Plaintiff, Kariah Buckmire, is ordered to appear for an independent
medical examination with Dr. Stephen J. Johans at a mutually agreed upon
date and time within thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order.
2. 	The place of the examination shall be located at Neurosurgery of St. Louis,
12855 North Forty Dr., North Tower, Suite 125, St. Louis, Missouri 63141.
3. 	The exam shall last no longer than one (1) hour.
Case 3:24-cv-02215-SPM Document 68 Filed 10/28/25 Page 1 of 3 Page ID
#<pageID>

Page 2 of 3
4. 	This 	physical 	examination 	will 	comprise 	of 	obtaining 	clinic 	history,
requesting Plaintiff to exhibit her range of motion in her neck and back, a
motor exam to reveal weakness in extremities, an analysis of sensations,
and a physical examination of her lumbar and cervical spine.
5. 	Should Dr. Johans request certain forms, demographics, or questionnaires
be filled out by Kariah Buckmire, said forms shall be furnished to Plaintiff's
counsel before the defense examination.
6. 	Dr. Johans will not attempt to perform medical treatment on Plaintiff
including the taking of diagnostic films.
7. 	Request by the Party or Person Examined. The party who moved for the
examination must, on request, deliver to the requester a copy of the
examiner’s report, together with like reports of all earlier examinations of
the same condition. The request may be made by the party against whom
the examination order was issued or by the person examined.
8. 	Contents. The examiner’s report must be in writing and must set out in
detail the examiner’s findings, including diagnoses, conclusions, and the
results of any tests.
9. 	Request by the Moving Party. After delivering the reports, the party who
moved for the examination may request—and is entitled to receive—from
the party against whom the examination order was issued like reports of
all earlier or later examinations of the same condition. But those reports
Case 3:24-cv-02215-SPM Document 68 Filed 10/28/25 Page 2 of 3 Page ID
#<pageID>

Page 3 of 3
need not be delivered by the party with custody or control of the person
examined if the party shows that it could not obtain them.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 28, 2025
s/ Stephen P. McGlynn
STEPHEN P. McGLYNN
U.S. District Judge
Case 3:24-cv-02215-SPM Document 68 Filed 10/28/25 Page 3 of 3 Page ID
#<pageID>