Porter v. Wallace et al

2:25-cv-00691Laed5 de mar. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
TOMARCUS PORTER 	CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS 	NO. 25-691
LANCE WALLACE, ET AL. 	SECTION “I” (2)
O R D E R
The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and
Recommendation1 of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file an
objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. 	Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Tomarcus Porter’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against
defendants Lance Wallace, Henry McMurry, Russell Roberts, Zachery Thigpen, Caleb Lemire,
Dereck Mingo, Austin Seals, Daniel Boyd, and Thomas Mitchell be DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, § 1915A and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e as frivolous and for
failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 5th day of March, 2026.
____________________________________
LANCE M. AFRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 	Rec. Doc. No. 15
Case 2:25-cv-00691-LMA Document 16 Filed 03/05/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.