Chan v. Bacdayan et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
YU HIN CHAN 	CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS 	NO. 25-1959
KAREN MAY BACDAYAN 	SECTION “R” (3)
ORDER AND REASONS
Plaintiff Yu Hin Chan, filed this pro se and in forma pauperis action
on September 19, 2025. 1 	On February 11, 2026, Magistrate Judge Eva J.
Dossier issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that
the Court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice. 2
Plaintiff did not object to the R&R. Therefore, the Court reviews the
R&R for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415,
1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note
(1983) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself
that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the
recommendation.”). The Court finds no clear error.
1 	R. Doc. 1.
2 	R. Doc. 6.
Case 2:25-cv-01959-SSV Document 7 Filed 03/10/26 Page 1 of 2

2
Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Dossier’s R&R as its
opinion. Chan’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this _____ day of March, 2026.
_____________________
SARAH S. VANCE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10th
Case 2:25-cv-01959-SSV Document 7 Filed 03/10/26 Page 2 of 2