Teter v. Aponte et al

3:25-cv-00178Lamd23 de jan. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

Case 3:25-cv-00178-BAJ-SDJ Document 19 01/23/26 Page 1 of 1

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 3:25-cv-00178-BAJ-SDJ
Document 19 01/23/26
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
DAVID TETER
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
CAMILA APONTE, ET AL.
NO. 25-00178-BAJ-SDJ
RULING AND ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 10). The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18, the "Report") recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. There are no objections to the Report.
Having carefully considered Defendant's Notice of Removal (Doc. 1), Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 10), and Defendant's Opposition to same (Doc. 14), the Court APPROVES the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and ADOPTS it as the Court's opinion in this matter.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) is DENIED.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 2nd day of January, 2026
Bia. A
JUDGE BRIAN A. JACKSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.