3:25-cv-00581•Thomas v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation
Thomas v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation
3:25-cv-00581Lamd19 de fev. de 2026
Texto completo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VIRGINIA THOMAS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION NO. 25-00581-BAJ-RLB RULING AND ORDER The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13, the "Report") recommending that the Court remand the above-captioned action to the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, based on Defendants failure to establish that the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional minimum for diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. There are no objections to the Report. Having carefully considered Defendants' Notice of Removal (Doc. 1) and the parties' memoranda setting forth their respective positions regarding whether Defendants have satisfied Section 1332 s amount-in-controversy requirement (Doc. 6; Doc. 10), the Court APPROVES the JVIagistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and ADOPTS it as the Court's opinion in this matter. Accordingly, Case 3:25-cv-00581-BAJ-RLB Document 14 02/19/26 Page 1 of 2
IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action be and is hereby immediately REMANDED to the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana. ad^ Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this ^cTaf of February, 2026 A>^JUDGE BRIAN A. J4?SON UNITED STATES D08TRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 3:25-cv-00581-BAJ-RLB Document 14 02/19/26 Page 2 of 2
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.