HOLMAN v. WIGGS et al

1:23-cv-00618Ncmd5 de mar. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
QUENTON D. HOLMAN, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) 1:23-cv-618
)
A.T. WIGGS, N.C. ALE Special )
Agent, K. KLUTTZ, N.C. ALE )
Special Agent, and UNIDENTIFIED )
DUKE CAMPUS POLICE OFFICER, )
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
On February 4, 2026, the United States Magistrate Judge’s
Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was
filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. (Docs. 38, 39.) No objections were filed within the time
limits prescribed by Section 636.
Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation, (Doc. 38), is ADOPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment, (Doc. 33), is DENIED.
Case 1:23-cv-00618-WO-LPA Document 40 Filed 03/05/26 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -
This the 5th day of March, 2026.
__________________________________
United States District Judge
Case 1:23-cv-00618-WO-LPA Document 40 Filed 03/05/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.