Walck v. Heinert et al

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Mitchell Lee Walck, 	)
) 	ORDER RE: § 1915A
Plaintiff, 	) 	SCREENING
)
vs. 	)
)
Mr. Pat Heinert, et al., 	)
) 	Case No.: 1:16-cv-331
Defendants. 	)
_____________________________________________________________________________
Before the Court is Walck’s complaint (Doc. No. 6). As articulated in the Court’s most
recent order, all suits filed by prisoners against governmental entities, officers, or employees
require an initial screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. This Court conducted the initial
screening, and on February 20, 2020, filed an order pursuant to § 1915A finding that Walck’s
complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and was subject to
dismissal. (Doc. No. 15). In that Order, the Court gave Walck until March 5, 2020, to file an
amended complaint. Id.
The March 5, 2020 deadline has elapsed, and the Court has received no additional filings
from Walck. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, his complaint is DISMISSED with
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 26th day of March, 2020.
/s/ Clare R. Hochhalter
Clare R. Hochhalter
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 1:16-cv-00331-DLH-CRH Document 16 Filed 03/26/20 Page 1 of 1