1:17-cv-00191•Gilliland v. Contract Land Staff, LLC et al
Texto completo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Daniel Gilliland, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER CANCELING FINAL PRETRIAL ) CONFERENCE AND TRIAL vs. ) ) North Dakota Pipeline ) Case No. 1:17-cv-191 Company, L.L.C., ) ) Defendant. ) The final pretrial conference set for September 5, 2019, and the trial set September 17, 2019 are CANCELLED. The court will establish new dates if it denies the pending motion for summary judgment.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 5th day of August, 2019. /s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr. Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge United States District Court 1 The parties should not draw any conclusions from this order how the court is going to rule on the motion. The court has not yet been able to get to the pending motion for summary judgment because it is still addressing other matters that are older or that have priority. The court issues the order only because it does not want the parties to incur costs unnecessarily. As always, the parties are encouraged to consider settlement. 1 Case 1:17-cv-00191-CSM Document 38 Filed 08/05/19 Page 1 of 2
2 Case 1:17-cv-00191-CSM Document 38 Filed 08/05/19 Page 2 of 2
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 1:17-cv-00191-CSM Document 38 Filed 08/05/19 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Daniel Gilliland, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER CANCELING FINAL PRETRIAL ) CONFERENCE AND TRIAL VS. ) ) North Dakota Pipeline ) Case No. 1:17-cv-191 Company, L.L.C., ) ) Defendant. ) The final pretrial conference set for September 5, 2019, and the trial set September 17, 2019 are CANCELLED. The court will establish new dates if it denies the pending motion for summary judgment.' IT ISSO ORDERED. Dated this Sth day of August, 2019. /s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr. Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge United States District Court ' The parties should not draw any conclusions from this order how the court is going to rule on the motion. The court has not yet been able to get to the pending motion for summary judgment because it is still addressing other matters that are older or that have priority. The court issues the order only because it does not want the parties to incur costs unnecessarily. As always, the parties are encouraged to consider settlement. 1 AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO Case 1:17-cv-00191-CSM Document 38 Filed 08/05/19 Page 2 of 2
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.