Idaho, State of et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
State of Idaho, et al., 	)
)
Plaintiffs, 	) 	ORDER
)
vs. 	)
)
United States Environmental Protection 	)
Agency, et al., 	) 	Case No. 1:24-cv-100
)
Defendants. 	)
On September 9, 2024, the parties filed a Joint Proposed Scheduling Plan. (Doc. No. 44).
The court ADOPTS the Parties’ plan (Doc. No. 44). The schedule and page limits for briefing
cross-motions for summary judgment on the merits are as follows:
1
Case 1:24-cv-00100-DLH-CRH Document 47 Filed 09/17/24 Page 1 of 2

The parties are relieved of the requirement in D.N.D. Civ. L. R. 7.1(A)(2) to include “a
recitation of the material facts that the moving party claims are uncontested” and the requirement
in D.N.D. Civ. L. R. 7.1(A)(3) to “state the facts upon which the party opposing summary judgment
relies and . . . clearly identify those facts that the opposing party claims are contested and that
require a trial.”
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 17th day of September, 2024.
/s/ Clare R. Hochhalter
Clare R. Hochhalter, Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Case 1:24-cv-00100-DLH-CRH Document 47 Filed 09/17/24 Page 2 of 2