USA v. Demery

3:16-cr-00092Ndd25 de set. de 2019

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
EASTERN DIVISION
United States of America, )
) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
Plaintiff, ) REDUCE SENTENCE (FIRST STEP
) ACT)
vs. )
)
Bobby Joe Demery, ) Case No. 3:16-cr-00092
)
Defendant. )
Before the Court is Defendant Bobby Joe Demery’s “motion for relief [p]ursuant to the
First Step Act of 2018, in accordance with Congress’ Statutory Change in section 404 (b)
Resentencing, absent a waiver,” filed on September 9, 2019. Doc. No. 114. Demery seeks relief
based on Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, which made retroactive the portions of the Fair
Sentencing Act of 2010 that lowered statutory penalties for certain offenses involving crack
cocaine. The Government responded in opposition to the motion on September 19, 2019. Doc.
No. 115. For the reasons below, the motion is denied.
On October 10, 2017, Demery pled guilty to Count 3 of a three-count Superseding
Indictment charging him with Providing a Controlled Substance to Underage Persons from on or
about July 30, 2014, until August 16, 2014, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 861(a)(1).1 Doc. No. 96.
On January 29, 2018, Demery appeared before the Court for sentencing. The Court adopted the
Presentence Investigation Report without change and determined that the applicable Guideline
range was 100 to 120 months’ imprisonment. Doc. No. 112. The count of conviction did not carry
1 Counts 1 and 2 were dismissed at sentencing upon motion of the Government. Doc. No. 110.
Case 3:16-cr-00092-PDW Document 116 Filed 09/25/19 Page 1 of 4
2
a mandatory minimum sentence. Id. The Court varied downward and sentenced Demery to 84
months’ imprisonment. Doc. No. 111.
Demery now seeks a sentence reduction under the First Step Act’s provisions regarding
the application of the Fair Sentencing Act. In 2010, Congress passed the Fair Sentencing Act,
which was designed to reduce sentencing disparity between cocaine and crack cocaine offenses.
Before the Fair Sentencing Act’s passage, a violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1) involving 50 grams
or more of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base (that is, crack cocaine) carried a
mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 10 years and a maximum term of life imprisonment.
21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A) (2009). A violation involving 5 grams or more of a mixture or substance
containing crack cocaine carried a mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years and a maximum
sentence of 40 years. Id. § 841(b)(1)(B). Section 2 of the Fair Sentencing Act increased these
threshold drug quantities from 50 grams to 280 grams and 5 grams to 28 grams, respectively. 111
Pub. L. No. 120, § 2, 124 Stat. 2372, 2372. In addition, Section 3 of the Fair Sentencing Act
eliminated the mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession of crack cocaine that had been
contained in 21 U.S.C. § 844(a). Id. § 3. The Fair Sentencing Act’s more lenient penalties for
crack cocaine offenses applied to any defendant sentenced on or after August 3, 2010, regardless
of when the offense occurred. Dorsey v. United States, 567 U.S. 260, 273, 281–82 (2012).2
The First Step Act of 2018 introduced a wide range of statutory provisions and amendments
aimed at criminal justice reform. In Section 404 of the First Step Act, Congress made retroactive
the Fair Sentencing Act’s reduced penalties for crack cocaine offenses. Under Section 404, the
sentencing court may, upon motion, “impose a reduced sentence as if sections 2 and 3 of the Fair
2 The Fair Sentencing Act did not affect the mandatory minimum and maximum terms of
imprisonment for any other controlled substances.
Case 3:16-cr-00092-PDW Document 116 Filed 09/25/19 Page 2 of 4
3
Sentencing Act . . . were in effect at the time the covered offense was committed.” 115 Pub. L.
No. 391, § 404(b). A “covered offense” is defined as “a violation of a Federal criminal statute, the
statutory penalties for which were modified by section 2 or 3 of the Fair Sentencing Act . . . , that
was committed before August 3, 2010.” Id. § 404(a). No court shall entertain a motion made
under Section 404 if the sentence was “previously imposed . . . in accordance with the amendments
made by sections 2 and 3 of the Fair Sentencing Act.” Id. § 404(c).
Demery is ineligible for relief under Section 404 of the First Step Act. First, Demery’s
offense did not involve crack cocaine. The Superseding Indictment and Presentence Investigation
Report make clear that Demery’s offense instead involved providing methamphetamine to a minor.
See Doc. Nos. 66, 100. Second, Demery committed the offense after August 3, 2010, and
accordingly was sentenced after that date. Lastly, the amendments made by the Fair Sentencing
Act applied to mandatory minimum sentences based on certain drug quantities, and Demery was
not subject to a mandatory minimum sentence. For these reasons, Demery’s offense is not a
“covered offense” under Section 404 of the First Step Act. Because Demery’s offense is not a
“covered offense,” the Court is precluded from reducing his sentence under Section 404 of the
Act.3
The Court has carefully reviewed the entire record, the parties’ filings, and the relevant
case law and statutory provisions. For the reasons stated above, Demery’s motion to reduce
sentence (Doc. No. 114) is DENIED.
3 Other sentencing reform provisions found in the First Step Act also would not apply to Demery
because of his offense date and sentencing date. See 115 Pub. L. No. 391, § 401 (applies to “any
offense that was committed before [December 21, 2018], if a sentence for the offense has not
been imposed as of” that date), § 402 (applies “only to a conviction entered on or after
[December 21, 2018]”), § 403 (applies to “any offense that was committed before [December 21,
2018], if a sentence for the offense has not been imposed as of” that date).
Case 3:16-cr-00092-PDW Document 116 Filed 09/25/19 Page 3 of 4
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 25th day of September, 2019.
/s/ Peter D. Welte
Peter D. Welte, District Judge
United States District Court
Case 3:16-cr-00092-PDW Document 116 Filed 09/25/19 Page 4 of 4

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.