USA v. Chandran et al

4:22-cr-03077Ned11 de fev. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NEIL LEE CHANDRAN, and BRYAN
LEE
Defendant.
4:22CR3077
ORDER
A telephone conference was held today. Defendant Chandran has moved to
continue the Rule 16 Expert Disclosure deadline (Filing No. 339). The motion to
continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion and the
comments of counsel during the telephone conference, the court finds good cause
has been shown and the motion should be granted in part and denied in part. The
Court further notes that, during the telephone conference, counsel for all parties
advised they are in agreement with the deadlines set forth herein. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant’s motion to continue, (Filing No. 339), is granted in part and
denied in part as set forth herein.
2) Defendant’s deadline to provide affirmative and rebuttal expert
witness disclosures as required under Rule 16 must be served on or
before February 26, 2026.
3) The Government’s deadline to provide rebuttal expert witness
disclosures as required under Rule 16 must be served on or before
March 16, 2026.
4) The parties’ shall file any motions regarding expert disclosures and/or
any motions to sever on or before April 1, 2026.
5) The Court will not consider any further extensions to these deadlines
absent a substantial showing of good cause given the upcoming trial
date, which has been set since May, 2025.
4:22-cr-03077-SMB-JMD Doc # 343 Filed: 02/11/26 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>
Dated this 11th day of February, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca
United States Magistrate Judge
4:22-cr-03077-SMB-JMD Doc # 343 Filed: 02/11/26 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.