USA v. Campbell et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SYLVESTER CAMPBELL
CYNTHIA HOLMES,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:24CR65
ORDER
This matter is before the court on defendant Cynthia Holmes’ Unopposed Motion
to Continue Trial [90]. Counsel needs additional time to complete plea negotiations. For
good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [90] is granted in
part as follows:
1. 	The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for February 10, 2026, is
continued to March 24, 2026.
2. 	In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of
justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests
of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising
as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date
and March 24, 2026, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of
time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. 	Failure to grant a
continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective
preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 	18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(6), (7)(A) & (B)(iv).
3. 	No further continuances will be granted without requesting a hearing
before the undersigned magistrate judge.
DATED: January 20, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Ryan C. Carson
United States Magistrate Judge
8:24-cr-00065-BCB-RCC Doc # 91 Filed: 01/20/26 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID #
<pageID>