Garrett v. Midwest Home Health, Inc.

8:24-cv-00344Ned26 de fev. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
KATELYN GARRETT,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MIDWEST HOME HEALTH, INC.,
Defendant.
8:24CV344
ORDER
The Court held a telephone conference with counsel for the parties on February 25, 2026,
regarding written discovery disputes. The parties submitted position statements and other
documents to the Court in advance of the hearing, which are attached to this Order. The Court’s
rulings on the parties’ disputes were stated on the record during the call, which was uploaded as a
separate audio file (Filing No. 47). In accordance with the Court’s rulings during the conference,
1. 	On 	February 	25, 	2026, 	Defendant 	submitted 	unredacted 	copies 	of 	Bate 	Nos.
MHH_0213-0230 to the undersigned magistrate judge for in camera review to
determine whether Defendant properly redacted privileged information. After review,
the Court finds Defendant properly redacted the documents, including the document
labeled MHH_0222.
2. 	Defendant’s objections to Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories and First and Second
Sets of Requests for Production of Documents are overruled. However, after review
of Defendant’s answers and responses, as supplemented, the Court finds Defendant has
sufficiently answered and responded to the written discovery. 	By March 19, 2026,
Defendant shall further supplement its answers and responses, as necessary.
3. 	For purposes of filing Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Orders under NECivR 72.2(a),
any party must do so within 14-days of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 26 th day of February, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
s/Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
8:24-cv-00344-JFB-MDN Doc # 48 Filed: 02/26/26 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID #
<pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.