8:25-cr-00017•USA v. Reyes-Andrade et al
Texto completo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EMERSON REYES-ANDRADE, MICHELLE RENEE HORTON, and VALLENE MARIE BELL, Defendants. 8:25CR17 ORDER This matter is before the Court on defendant Emerson Reyes-Andrade’s Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial (Filing No. 103). Counsel needs additional time to conclude plea negotiations. The government and counsel for co-defendants have no objection to the continuance. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial (Filing No. 103) is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for January 20, 2026, is continued to February 17, 2026. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date and February 17, 2026, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6), (7)(A) & (B)(iv). 3. No further continuances will be granted barring exceptional circumstances. Dated this 13th day of January 2026. BY THE COURT: Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. Chief United States District Judge 8:25-cr-00017-RFR-RCC Doc # 104 Filed: 01/13/26 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # <pageID>
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.