USA v. Titsworth et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ABE LYTLE,
Defendant.
8:25CR187
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Second Motion to Enlarge Deadlines,
(Filing No. 52). For good cause shown, the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) 	Defendant’s Second Motion to Enlarge Deadlines, (Filing No. 52), is granted.
2) 	Pretrial motions shall be filed by November 7, 2025.
3) 	In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of
justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the
public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result
of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between October 24, 2025 and
November 7, 2025, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time
under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would
deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into
account the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case.
The failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C.
§ 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this
court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time should
not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
4) 	No additional extensions absent a showing of particular good cause and
without requesting a hearing before the undersigned magistrate judge.
Dated this 28th day of October, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Ryan C. Carson
United States Magistrate Judge
8:25-cr-00187-BCB-RCC Doc # 58 Filed: 10/28/25 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID #
<pageID>