8:25-cv-00140•Ramos v. Columbus Hydraulics Company
Texto completo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JONATHAN F. RAMOS, Plaintiff, vs. COLUMBUS HYDRAULICS COMPANY, Inc.; Defendant. 8:25CV140 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis. Filing No. 13. Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal, Filing No. 12, on December 23, 2025. Plaintiff appeals from the Court’s Memorandum and Order and Judgment dated November 26, 2025, Filing Nos. 10 & 11, in which the Court dismissed this matter without prejudice. As set forth in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3): (a) Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis . . . (3) Prior Approval. A party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district-court action, or who was determined to be financially unable to obtain an adequate defense in a criminal case, may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization, unless: (A) the district court--before or after the notice of appeal is filed--certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith or finds that the party is not otherwise entitled to proceed in forma pauperis and states in writing its reasons for the certification or finding . . . . The Court finds that because Plaintiff proceeded IFP in the district court, he may now proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further 8:25-cv-00140-JMG-PRSE Doc # 14 Filed: 01/02/26 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # <pageID>
2 authorization. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis, Filing No. 13, is granted. Dated this 2nd day of January, 2026. BY THE COURT: _________________________________ John M. Gerrard Senior United States District Judge 8:25-cv-00140-JMG-PRSE Doc # 14 Filed: 01/02/26 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # <pageID>
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.