Daly Dejillas v. Sherman Enterprises, LLC et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CAILIN DALY DEJILLAS, Director of the
Omaha Human Rights and Relations
Department, on behalf of Steven K.
Johnson;
Plaintiff,
vs.
SHERMAN ENTERPRISES, LLC, and
MERLE R. VERMUELE,
Defendants.
8:25CV182
AMENDED
CASE PROGRESSION ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Joint Motion for Extension of Scheduling
Deadlines (Filing No. 25). After review of the parties’ motion, the Court finds good cause to grant
the requested extensions. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Extension of Scheduling Deadlines (Filing No.
25) is granted, and the case progression order is amended as follows:
1) The deadline for completing written discovery under Rules 33, 34, 36, and 45 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is March 31, 2026. Motions to compel
written discovery under Rules 33, 34, 36, and 45 must be filed by April 14, 2026.
Note: A motion to compel, to quash, or for a disputed protective order shall not
be filed without first contacting the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge
on or before the motion to compel deadline to set a conference to discuss the
parties’ dispute, and after being granted leave to do so by the Court.
2) The planning conference set for January 28, 2026, is cancelled. The trial and
pretrial conference will not be set at this time. A planning conference to discuss
case progression, dispositive motions, the parties’ interest in settlement, and the
trial and pretrial conference settings will be held with the undersigned magistrate
judge on May 13, 2026, at 10:30 a.m. by telephone. Counsel shall use the
conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference.
3) The deposition deadline, including but not limited to depositions for oral
testimony only under Rule 45, is May 15, 2026.
4) The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment is
July 31, 2026.
5) The parties shall comply with all other stipulations and agreements recited in their
Rule 26(f) planning report that are not inconsistent with this order.
8:25-cv-00182-BCB-MDN Doc # 26 Filed: 01/13/26 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>

6) All requests for changes of deadlines or settings established herein shall be
directed to the undersigned magistrate judge. Such requests will not be considered
absent a showing of due diligence in the timely progression of this case and the
recent development of circumstances, unanticipated prior to the filing of the
motion, which require that additional time be allowed.
Dated this 13th day of January, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
s/Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
8:25-cv-00182-BCB-MDN Doc # 26 Filed: 01/13/26 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>