Widi, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
David J. Widi, Jr.
v. Civil No. 14-cv-160-SM
Federal Bureau of Prisons et al.1
O R D E R
Plaintiff David Widi’s complaint (doc. no. 2, at pp. 2-43)
is before this court for preliminary review pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915A and LR 4.3(d)(1). The complaint includes two
counts asserting multiple claims for relief. A Report and
Recommendation issued this date (“R&R”) subdivides those two
counts into a list of eight claims, and recommends dismissal of
the claims identified in the R&R as Claims 1, 2, and 6-8.
The court directs service of the complaint with respect to
Claims 3-5, as numbered in the R&R. Service shall be effected
1Defendants named in this action are the Federal Bureau of
Prisons; United States Probation and Pretrial Services;
Probation Officer Scott Hastings; Federal Correctional
Institution (“FCI”) Ray Brook Warden Donald Hudson; FCI Ray
Brook Case Management Coordinator Gaunyea, whose first name is
unknown (“FNU”); FCI Ray Brook Unit Manager David Salamy; FCI
Ray Brook Case Managers FNU Glue and Y. Matteau; FCI Berlin
Warden Esker Tatum; FCI Berlin Case Management Coordinator Dan
Sullivan; FCI Berlin Unit Manager Wanda Mullins; and FCI Berlin
Correctional Counselors L. Hogan and FNU Langley.
Case 1:14-cv-00160-SM Document 5 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 3

2
upon defendants Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) Ray
Brook Warden Donald Hudson, FCI Ray Brook Case Management
Coordinator FNU Gaunyea, FCI Ray Brook Unit Manager David
Salamy, FCI Ray Brook Case Managers FNU Glue and Y. Matteau, FCI
Berlin Warden Esker Tatum, FCI Berlin Case Management
Coordinator Dan Sullivan, and FCI Berlin Unit Manager Wanda
Mullins.
The clerk’s office shall prepare and issue summonses for
each of those defendants, using addresses for FCI Berlin and FCI
Ray Brook as appropriate. Upon issuance of those summonses, the
clerk’s office is further directed to provide the summonses and
a copy of the complaint (doc. no. 2, at pp. 2-43), the R&R, and
this Order to the U.S. Marshal for the District of New Hampshire
(“U.S. Marshal”).
Upon receipt of those documents, the U.S. Marshal shall
serve the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1),
and shall also serve each individual, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 4(e).
Defendants are instructed to answer or otherwise plead
within 21 days of service, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
81(c)(2)(B).
Case 1:14-cv-00160-SM Document 5 Filed 06/24/14 Page 2 of 3

3
Plaintiff is instructed to serve all future pleadings,
written motions, notices, or similar papers directly on
defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to defendants
or their attorney(s), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.
SO ORDERED.
__________________________
Andrea K. Johnstone
United States Magistrate Judge
June 24, 2014
cc: David J. Widi, Jr.
T. David Plourde, Esq.
Case 1:14-cv-00160-SM Document 5 Filed 06/24/14 Page 3 of 3