Matheson v. Lacasse et al

1:17-cv-00036Nhd30 de mai. de 2017

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Josh Matheson
v.
Kim Lacasse, et al
Civil No. 17-cv-00036-PB
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of
Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated May 2, 2017. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised
by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not
preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l
Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human
Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4,
6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Paul Barbadoro
United States District Court
Date: May 30, 2017
cc: Josh Matheson, pro se
Counsel of Record
Case 1:17-cv-00036-PB Document 19 Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.