Matthews v. FCI Berlin, Warden

1:17-cv-00108Nhd28 de jun. de 2017

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Alexander Otis Matthew
v.
FCI Berlin, Warden
Case No. 17-cv-108-SM
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated May 25, 2017 (document no. 5, for the reasons
set forth therein.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to
the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district
court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on
appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617
F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of
Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see
also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.
1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection
to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
Mr. Matthews’ § 2241 Petition is hereby dismissed. The
Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this
order and close the case.
Case 1:17-cv-00108-SM Document 6 Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 2
Additionally, finding that the petitioner has failed to
make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right, the court declines to issue a certificate of
appealability. 	See 28 U.S.C.§ 2253(c)(2); Rule 11, Rules
Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254; First Cir. LR
22.0.
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: June 28, 2017
cc: 	Alexander Otis Matthews, pro se
Seth Aframe, AUSA
Case 1:17-cv-00108-SM Document 6 Filed 06/28/17 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.