Adams v. Oakridge Direct Solutions Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Athena Adams
v.
Oakridge Direct Solutions Corp.
Case No. 17-cv-202-AJ
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated April 3, 2018. 	“‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
/s/ Joseph N. Laplante
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
Chief Judge
Date: May 1, 2018
cc: John F. Skinner, III, Esq.
Case 1:17-cv-00202-AJ Document 13 Filed 05/01/18 Page 1 of 1