Woodham v. NH, State of et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Grace Woodham
v.
State of New Hampshire, et al
Case No. 20-cv-537-SE
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated April 17,
2023. For the reasons explained therein, Ms. Woodham’s motion for
temporary restraining order (doc. no. 24) is denied without prejudice
to seek such a relief in a civil action in a court of competent
jurisdiction.
“[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate’s report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Sch.
Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir.
2010) (quotation omitted); see United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792
F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a
specific objection to magistrate’s report will waive the right to
appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Samantha D. Elliott
United States District Judge
Date: May 5, 2023
cc: Grace Woodham, pro se
Case 1:20-cv-00537-SE Document 27 Filed 05/05/23 Page 1 of 1