Beers v. NH State Prison, Warden et al

1:20-cv-00968Nhd16 de mar. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Timothy Beers
v.
NH State Prison, Warden
Case No. 20-cv-968-LM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated February
24, 2026. For the reasons explained therein, Beers’s “Motion:
Retaliation Claim” (Doc. No. 137) seeking to add a retaliation claim
to this action and obtain preliminary injunctive relief related to
that claim is denied. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the
objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the
district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded
on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d
554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health &
Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United
States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper
notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report
will waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: March 16, 2026
cc: Timothy Beers, pro se
Counsel of Record
Case 1:20-cv-00968-LM Document 168 Filed 03/16/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.