Casanova v. Ramos

1:21-cv-00851Nhd7 de jun. de 2023

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Daniel Casanova
v.
Corporal Nunez fka FNU Ramos, et. al.
Case No. 21-cv-851-PB
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone
dated May 8, 2023, and deny the motion to serve Ms. Mattis (Doc. no.
83). 	“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848
F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to
file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right
to appeal).
____________________________
Paul J. Barbadoro
United States District Judge
Date: June 7, 2023
cc: Daniel Casanova, pro se
Counsel of Record
/s/Paul Barbadoro
Case 1:21-cv-00851-PB Document 90 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.