Caceres v. FCI Berlin, Warden

1:23-cv-00058Nhd13 de set. de 2023

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Richard Caceres
v.
FCI Berlin, Warden
Case No. 23-cv-00058-PB-AJ
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone
dated August 11, 2023, deny petitioner's motion for summary judgment
(Doc. No. 8), and grant respondent's motion for summary judgment (Doc.
No. 9). 	The clerk of court shall enter judgment and close this case.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848
F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to
file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right
to appeal).
____________________________
Paul J. Barbadoro
United States District Judge
Date: September 13, 2023
cc: Richard Caceres, pro se
Counsel of Record
/s/Paul Barbadoro
Case 1:23-cv-00058-PB-AJ Document 11 Filed 09/13/23 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.