1:23-cv-00085•Gonzalez v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Texto completo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE David Gonzalez v. FCI Berlin, Warden Case No. 23-CV-85-SE ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated January 24, 2024. For the reasons explained therein, the Warden’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 6) is granted, and the Petitioner’s Motion for Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 10) is denied. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). ____________________________ Samantha D. Elliott United States District Judge Date: March 27, 2024 cc: David Gonzalez, pro se Counsel of record Case 1:23-cv-00085-SE Document 13 Filed 03/27/24 Page 1 of 1
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.