Sandsbury v. Teers et al

1:24-cv-00092Nhd27 de mai. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Eugene Sandsbury
v.
John Teers, et al
Case No. 24-cv-92-SM-TSM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated April 19,
2024, for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to
review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection
are precluded on appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins.
Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary
of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also
United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after
proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's
report will waive the right to appeal).
The clerk of court shall enter judgment and close the case.
So Ordered.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: May 27, 2024
cc: 	Eugene Sandsbury, pro se
Case 1:24-cv-00092-SM-TSM Document 8 Filed 05/27/24 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.