Williams v. US Court

1:24-cv-00182Nhd21 de out. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Jay Williams
v.
US Court
Case No. 24-cv-182-LM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated
September 9, 2024. 	The motion for a writ of habeas corpus and motion
for discovery (docs. 5 and 6) are denied as moot. “‘[O]nly those
issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are
subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by
such objection are precluded on appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting
Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st
Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6
(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific
objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
The clerk shall enter judgment and close this case.
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: October 21, 2024
cc: Jay Williams, pro se
Case 1:24-cv-00182-LM-TSM Document 8 Filed 10/21/24 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.