1:04-bk-10659•Juan Gabriel Valdez and Cynthia Valdez
Texto completo
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO PACER Cover Sheet for Electronically Filed Documents Any data shown here are current as of . Any element of information on this form, except the received date, is subject to change as changes may be made to the Court's official docket. Case Title: Case Number: Document Information Description: Date Filed: Date Entered On Docket: Filer Information Submitted By: If this form is attached to the document identified above, it serves as an endorsed copy of the document as it existed on the above date. To confirm that nothing has changed since then, review the docket. 06/10/06 Juan Gabriel Valdez and Cynthia Valdez 04-10659 Order Granting in Part, Denying in Part [39-1] Application For Compensation ( Fees: $ 3,484.77, Expenses: $ 253.70) by Glen L Houston payment to Glen L. Houston of $3093.54 in fees . Received on: 2005-05-25 15:00:41.000 2005-05-25 00:00:00.000 2005-05-31 00:00:00.000 Patti Hennessy Case 04-10659-m13 Doc 51 Filed 05/25/05 Entered 05/31/05 09:58:00 Page 1 of 7
1The total amount of the itemized fees and costs in Exhibit B to the First Supplemental Application for Attorney’s Fees is $3,715.67, which includes the $194.00 used to pay the filing fee. 2The First Supplemental Application for Attorney’s Fees lists a balance of $3,112.67, which appears to be a mathematical error. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO In re: JUAN GABRIEL VALDEZ and No. 13-04-10659 MR CYNTHIA VALDEZ, Debtors. ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, and DENYING, IN PART, FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Application for Attorney’s Fees and the First Supplemental Application for Attorney’s Fees (together, “Fee Application”) filed by Glen L. Houston, attorney for the Debtor. The Fee Application seeks approval of attorneys’ fees in the total amount of $3,521.671 as an administrative expense of the estate for the period from November 23, 2003 through August 16, 2004. Counsel has received $600.00, from which $194.00 was used to pay the filing fee, and $406.00 was applied to attorney’s fees, leaving an outstanding balance of attorney’s fees in the amount of $3,115.672 plus applicable New Mexico gross receipts taxes. The Chapter 13 Trustee objected to the Fee Application, asserting, among other things, that some of the charges are for clerical work, and that some of the entries appear to be duplicative inasmuch as both the attorney and the paralegal appear to be billing for the same task, or because several entries appear for the same task. The Court held a final hearing on the Fee Application and took the matter under advisement. After considering the Fee Application, and being otherwise sufficiently informed, the Court finds that some of Case 04-10659-m13 Doc 51 Filed 05/25/05 Entered 05/31/05 09:58:00 Page 2 of 7
2 the requested fees and costs must be disallowed. In reaching this determination the Court FINDS: 1. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(4)(B), In a chapter 12 or chapter 13 case in which the debtor is an individual, the court may allow reasonable compensation to the debtor’s attorney for representing the interests of the debtor in connection with the bankruptcy case based on a consideration of the benefit and necessity of such services to the debtor and the other factors set forth in this section. 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(4)(B). 2. Reasonableness is determined based upon such factors as the amount of time spent on the service, the rate charged, and whether the services were necessary to the administration of the bankruptcy estate. 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(3). Compensation will not be allowed for “unnecessary duplication of services”, for services that “were not reasonably likely to benefit the estate” nor for services that are not “necessary to the administration of the case.” 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(4)(A). Similarly, when excessive time is billed for uncomplicated matters, the attorney is not entitled to compensation for the total requested amount despite the fact that the work was actually done. See In re Colorado-Ute Elec. Ass’n, Inc., 132 B.R. 174, 177 (Bankr.D.Colo. 1991) (“In applying for fees, attorneys ‘should make a good-faith effort to exclude from a fee request hours that are excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary.’” (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434, 103 S.Ct. 1933, 1939-1940, 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983)). In re Reconversion Technologies, Inc., 216 B.R. 46, 56 (Bankr.N.D.Okla. 1997) (In determining the amount of reasonable compensation, the court “should disallow hours that were 'duplicative, unproductive, excessive, or otherwise unnecessary.’” (quoting In re Shades of Beauty, Inc., 56 B.R. 946, 951 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1986) (citations omitted). 3. The fee applicant bears the burden of showing entitlement to the requested compensation. Case 04-10659-m13 Doc 51 Filed 05/25/05 Entered 05/31/05 09:58:00 Page 3 of 7
3 See In re Recycling Industries, Inc., 243 B.R. 396, 402 (Bankr.D.Colo. 2000) (“It is well settled that the burden of proof as to the reasonableness of compensation is on the fee applicant.”); In re Amdura Corp., 139 B.R. 963, 968 (Bankr.D.Colo. 1992). 4. Time keeping records submitted in support of a fee application must sufficiently describe the work performed to enable the Court to determine whether the fees requested are reasonable and necessary. Amdura, 139 B.R. at 972. Descriptions for completed tasks that are too vague prevents the Court from determining reasonableness, and may result in the denial of fees for those tasks. Id. 5. Time spent on matters that are clerical in nature is not compensable. See In re Copeland, 154 B.R. 693, 699 (Bankr.W.D.Mich. 1993) (examining fees requested by attorney for chapter 13 debtor, and noting that “The work for which lawyers receive compensation must be legal, not ministerial or clerical.”). Rather, clerical work is part of office overhead. See Amdura, 139 B.R. at 985. For example, time spent leaving telephone messages is not compensable as legal work. Copeland, 154 B.R. at 702. 6. The Court finds that the hourly rates requested in the Fee Application of $175.00 for work performed by the attorney time and $75.00 for work performed by paralegals is reasonable. 7. After review of the itemized billing records attached to the Fee Application, the Court finds that some entries must be disallowed because they are not reasonable or necessary. Specifically, the following entries are disallowed for the reasons stated: Date Entry Time Amount Reason for Disallowance 11/23/03 telephone call from client; Left message to call back .01667 $1.25 Clerical Case 04-10659-m13 Doc 51 Filed 05/25/05 Entered 05/31/05 09:58:00 Page 4 of 7
4 11/24/03 telephone call from client. checking in on converting case to chapter 13 .1 $7.50 Excessive 1/12/04 telephone call from Virginia Teague with Estacado Credit Union wanting to speak w/ Dwayne regarding client’s bankruptcy;. Lefter her phone number to call her at 396- 7727 .1 $7.50 Clerical 02/02/04 fax notice of bankruptcy to court and opposing counsel; mail notice of bankruptcy to clients .2 $15.00 Clerical 02/02/04 telephone call from client; he wants to know if his case was filed because they are going to foreclose on his house; advised him case was filed on Friday 1/30/04; We did not know the case # .3 $22.50 Excessive 02/09/04 Rec’d, rev’d & Post re: notice of 341hearing for 3/18/04 at 10am .1 $7.50 Clerical 02/12/04 T>Returned Gabriel Valdez’s cal. No answer. Left message on answering machine. .2 $7.50 Clerical 02/27/04 make copies of chapter 13 plan; sort, collate, and mail to 59 creditors 2.0 $150.00 Clerical 03/09/04 Cindy called to speak to RR - left msg that would call later .1 $7.50 Clerical 03/12/04 telephone call from client for DB. Left message to call him .1 $7.50 Clerical Case 04-10659-m13 Doc 51 Filed 05/25/05 Entered 05/31/05 09:58:00 Page 5 of 7
5 03/16/04 LDT.Sara with Chapter 13 trustee’s office following upon the continuance of the § 341 hearing scheduled for Thursday. Left Message .05 $3.75 Clerical 03/18/04 review and sign letter to client enclosing reminder from Kelley Skehen .1 $7.50 Excessive 03/19/04 preparation and mailing of § 341 hearing notice for April 22, 2004 at 10 am to 42 creditors 1.6667 $204.17 Excessive; clerical 03/19/04 Copying and mailing § 341 hearing notice to all creditors 1.0 $75.00 Duplicative; clerical 04/09/04 LTD> Jim Askew’s office and left a message for an extension on the Response to Motion to Lift Stay .1 $7.50 Clerical 04/26/04 Receive, review and Post Notice of Hearing .05 $3.75 Clerical 04/29/04 Nicole/WFS Financial called re: continue pmt on vehicle? Please call her @ 800 752- 88533 ext 26144 .05 $3.75 Clerical 05/06/04 Fax approved stipulated order denying motion to dismiss to Kelley Skehen .1 $7.50 Clerical 06/16/04 Review and sign Notice of Final Hearing on Confirmation of Debtor’s Chapter 13 Plan .3 $52.50 Excessive 08/03/04 Copied letter from Taxation and Revenue Regarding Non- Filed tax returns and mailed to client .1 $7.50 Clerical Case 04-10659-m13 Doc 51 Filed 05/25/05 Entered 05/31/05 09:58:00 Page 6 of 7
6 The total disallowed amount is $606.67. WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Fee Application is approved, in part, and denied, in part. Total fees in the amount of $2,915.00, plus applicable New Mexico gross receipts taxes in the amount of $178.54 (at the rate of .06125 as reported on the Fee Application) are allowed, less $406.00 which counsel has already received, leaving a balance of allowed fees in the amount of $2,687.54. The remainder of fees requested in the Fee Application are disallowed. _________________________________________ MARK B. McFEELEY United States Bankruptcy Judge I certify that on the date shown on the attached document verification, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was either electronically transmitted, faxed, delivered or mailed to the listed counsel and/or parties. Glen L. Houston Attorney for Debtor 1304 W. Broadway Pl. Hobbs, NM 88240 Kelley L. Skehen Chapter 13 Truste 625 Silver SW, Suite 350 Albuquerque, NM 87102 ________________________________ Patti G. Hennessy Law Clerk (505) 348-2545 Case 04-10659-m13 Doc 51 Filed 05/25/05 Entered 05/31/05 09:58:00 Page 7 of 7
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.