Johnson v. McCurdy et al

6:23-cv-00058Oked31 de ago. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
LAMONE M. JOHNSON, 	)
a/k/a Marylin Monae Porter, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	CIV-22-23-R
)
JOEL MCCURDY, ET AL., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
ORDER
Before the Court is the Supplemental Report and Recommendation issued by
Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, wherein he recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for
Temporary Restraining Order be denied. (Doc. No. 53). Plaintiff did not file an objection
to the Report and Recommendation and accordingly it is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff,
apparently in lieu of filing an objection filed a “Motion for Permission to Leave to File
Amended Motion” (Doc. No. 61). That motion is hereby GRANTED and the Court accepts
the attached motion as filed. (Doc. No. 62). The Court hereby refers the Amended Motion
to Judge Purcell for consideration.1
IT IS SO ORDERED this 31 st day of August 2022.
1 Consideration of the motion is complicated by the Court’s Order issued this same date in which it granted the Motion
to Dismiss of the Utilization Review Committee and granted Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint to name
the current Chief Medical Officer and the Doe members of the Utilization Review Committee.
6:23-cv-00058-RAW-GLJ Document 64 Filed in ED/OK on 08/31/22 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.