Jackson v. Haines

6:25-cv-00056Oked9 de jan. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JUSTINE ANGEL JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 25-CV-056-JFH-GLJ
JEFF HAINES,
Defendant.
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. No. 57] of United States
Magistrate Gerald L. Jackson recommending that Defendant Haines’ Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No.
12] and Renewed Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 40] be granted; Defendant Haines’ Motion for
Sanctions [Dkt. No. 41] be denied; Plaintiff’s Motion to Submit Evidence with Attached Exhibits
[Dkt. No. 44] be denied; Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Harassing Filings and Notice of
Abuse of Process [Dkt. No. 46] be denied; Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Defendant and Clarify
Capacity [Dkt. No. 52] be denied; and Plaintiff’s Motion for Defendants to Produce Alleged
Injured party (Corpus Delicti/Federal Civil Case) [Dkt. No. 55] be denied.
Neither party objected to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation within the
14-day period prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Having reviewed the Report and
Recommendation, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, and accepts
and adopts it as the order of the Court. On that basis, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Haines
are DISMISSED, and the other motions listed above are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of January 2026.
____________________________________
JOHN F. HEIL, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6:25-cv-00056-JFH-GLJ Document 58 Filed in ED/OK on 01/09/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.