Tarver v. Wofford et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JC TARVER, )
)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. CIV-25-179-RAW-JAR
)
DARRELL WOFFORD, et al., )
)
)
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
Before the court is the Findings and Recommendation (#10) of the
United States Magistrate Judge, in which he recommended that this
action be dismissed without prejudice.
No objection has been filed and the time allotted for doing so has
expired. “In the absence of a timely objection, the district court may
review a magistrate’s report under any standard it deems appropriate.”
Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir.1991). The court
agrees with the reasoning of the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and
recommendation and finds that “there is no clear error on the face of the
record.” See Rule 72(b) F.R.Cv.P., advisory committee note.
6:25-cv-00179-RAW-JAR Document 11 Filed in ED/OK on 05/07/26 Page 1 of 2

It is the order of the court that the Findings and Recommendation
(#10) is affirmed and adopted as the order of the court. This action is
dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of MAY, 2026.
_________________________________
RONALD A. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
6:25-cv-00179-RAW-JAR Document 11 Filed in ED/OK on 05/07/26 Page 2 of 2