Frederick v. Johnson

5:24-cv-00837Okwd23 de abr. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JOSEPH FREDERICK, 	)
)
Petitioner, 	)
)
v. 	) 	No. CIV-24-837-R
)
CASEY HAMILTON, Warden, et al., 	)
)
Respondents. 	)
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Chris M. Stephens, entered on February 19, 2026 [Doc. No. 24]. No objection to the
Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object
been sought or granted. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of Judge Stephens is
ADOPTED in its entirety and Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28
U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. No. 10] is DENIED. The standard for issuance of a Certificate of
Appealability is not satisfied in this case and a Certificate of Appealability is therefore
DENIED. See Montez v. McKinna, 208 F.3d 862, 869 (10th Cir. 2000); Ramer v. Maxwell,
4 F. App’x 551, 553-54 (10th Cir. 2001) (unpublished).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23 rd day of April, 2026.
Case 5:24-cv-00837-R Document 25 Filed 04/23/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.