Guzman Morales v. Mullin et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
ROMAN GUZMAN MORALES, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. CIV-26-587-SLP
)
MARKWAYNE MULLIN, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
O R D E R
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States
Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mithcell [Doc. No. 11]. The Magistrate Judge recommends that
the Court deny Petitioner’s Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or
Preliminary Injunction [Doc. No. 6] for failure to comply with the requirements of Fed. R.
Civ. P. 65(b). R&R [Doc. No. 11] at 1-2. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties of their
right to object to the R&R and directed that any objections be filed on or before April 7,
2026. Id. at 2-3. The parties were further advised that any failure to object would waive
the Parties’ right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the R&R.
Id. at 3. None of the parties have filed an objection, nor has an extension of time in which
to object been sought or granted. Therefore, the Court finds that the parties have waived
further review of all issues addressed in the R&R. See Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d
1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010).
Upon review, the Court fully concurs with the analysis set forth in the R&R.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 11] is ADOPTED in its entirety
Case 5:26-cv-00587-SLP Document 14 Filed 04/09/26 Page 1 of 2

2
and Petitioner’s Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary
Injunction [Doc. No. 6] is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of April, 2026.
Case 5:26-cv-00587-SLP Document 14 Filed 04/09/26 Page 2 of 2