BLD REALTY INC v. PERFECT PRICE INC et al

3:22-ap-00034Prb6 de fev. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

-1-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
IN RE:
BLD REALTY INC.
Debtor
BLD REALTY INC.
Plaintiff
v.
PERFECT PRICE INC.; PERFECTO RIVERA
IZQUIERDO; 	LATIN 	INVESTMENT 	CORP.;
RAMON 	CLAS 	VAZQUEZ; 	MICHAEL 	A.
PABON 	RIVERA; 	PRODUCTOS 	LA
PERFECTA, CORP.; JOHN DOE 1-5
Defendants
CASE NO. 22-00802 (MCF)
CHAPTER 11
ADVERSARY CASE NO. 22-00034
OPINION AND ORDER
Codefendant, Michael A. Pabon, moves for summary judgment as to him regarding the
first, eight, ninth and tenth causes of action in the complaint (Docket No. 338). 	The Plaintiff,
BLD Realty Inc., opposes the motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 357). For the reasons
expressed below, the court grants in part as to first and eight counts of the complaint but denies
in part as to the ninth and tenth counts of the complaint.
The Plaintiff, BLD Realty Inc., filed a ten-count complaint against various defendants. In
a prior opinion and order, the court dismissed the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh
counts of the complaint (Docket No. 65). 	The first, eighth, ninth, and tenth counts of the
complaint survived. The first cause of action seeks a declaratory judgment that the monies owned
by co-defendants Perfecto Price, Inc. and Mr. Perfecto Rivera constitute property of the estate,
Case:22-00034-MCF Doc#:420 Filed:02/06/26 Entered:02/06/26 16:23:44 Desc: Main
Document Page 1 of 3
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 541.1 The eight cause of action involves a turnover of property, pursuant
to 11 U.S.C. § 542. 	The ninth cause of action seek damages for tortious interference and/or
collusion, and the last count seeks to pierce the corporate veil. 	Pabon moves for summary
judgment on the remaining counts.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and
the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; Fed. R. Bankr.
P. 7056.
In his motion for summary judgment, Pabon shows that he is not named as a party
defendant in the first and eight counts of the complaint and that those counts should be denied as
to him. We agree. 	It is undisputed that the first count centers around a local court judgment
entered against codefendants Perfect Price, Inc. and Mr. Perfecto Rivera regarding past due rents
owed to BLD. The eighth count seeks turnover of the rent monies. Pabon was never sued in the
local court case nor was judgment entered against him. Nor is Pabon named in the allegations of
the first and eight causes of action of the complaint. Pabon is therefore entitled to judgment in
his favor.
Pabon, however, is not entitled to summary judgment as to the ninth and tenth counts of
the complaint because these counts involve issues of controverted facts. The ninth action pertains
to damages for tortious interference and/or collusion. The disputed facts are the existence of a
contract and/or agreement between BLD and Triangle REO PR Corp. 	BLD owned two real
properties. 	BLD had a mortgage with Triangle which allegedly was being paid from the rent
monies received by Perfect Price, Inc. 	Mr. Perfect Rivera, president of Perfect Price, Inc.,
guaranteed the rental payment from his corporation to BLD. The complaint avers that while BLD
and Triangle were negotiating a discount payoff amount, Perfect Price, Inc. and its owner ceased
1 Unless otherwise indicated, all references to “Bankruptcy Code” or to specific statutory sections are to the
Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, as amended, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532. All references to “Bankruptcy Rule” are to the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and all references to “Rule” are to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All
references to “Local Bankruptcy Rule” are to the Local Bankruptcy Rules of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Puerto Rico. All references to “Local Civil Rule” are to the Local Rules of Civil Practice of the United
States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico.
Case:22-00034-MCF Doc#:420 Filed:02/06/26 Entered:02/06/26 16:23:44 Desc: Main
Document Page 2 of 3
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
to pay rent to BLD and interfered in the negotiations with Triangle. Then another corporation,
Latin Investment Corp., purchased the mortgage note from Triangle. 	It is alleged that all the
defendants are related and conspired to take BLD’s two real properties. 	For those averments,
BLD asserts in the tenth count that the corporate veil should be pierced. It is also controverted
whether defendants’ action interfered with the alleged contract and/or agreement as well as the
dates of such alleged actions.
Consequently, Pabon is entitled to summary judgment in his favor for the first and eight
counts but not as to the ninth and tenth counts of the complaint (Docket No. 338).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 6th day of February 2026.
______________________________
MILDRED CABAN FLORES
United States Bankruptcy Judge
Case:22-00034-MCF Doc#:420 Filed:02/06/26 Entered:02/06/26 16:23:44 Desc: Main
Document Page 3 of 3

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.